Measurement, Estimation and Comparison of Credit Migration Matrices

by Yusuf Jafry of the Risk Integrated Group, and
Til Schuermann of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York

November 2004

Abstract: Credit migration matrices are cardinal inputs to many risk management applications; their accurate estimation is therefore critical. We explore two approaches: cohort and two variants of duration - one imposing, the other relaxing time homogeneity - and the resulting differences, both statistically through matrixnorms and economically using a credit portfolio model. We propose a new metric for comparing these matrices based on singular values and apply it to credit rating histories of S&P rated US firms from 1981-2002. We show that the migration matrices have been increasing in ''size" since the mid-1990s, with 2002 being the "largest" in the sense of being the most dynamic. We develop a testing procedure using bootstrap techniques to assess statistically the differences between migration matrices as represented by our metric. We demonstrate that it can matter substantially which estimation method is chosen: economic credit risk capital differences implied by different estimation techniques can be as large as differences between economic regimes, recession vs. expansion. Ignoring the efficiency gain inherent in the duration methods by using the cohort method instead is more damaging than imposing a (possibly false) assumption of time homogeneity.

JEL Classification: C13, C41, G21, G28.

Keywords: Mobility index, Matrix norm, Singular values, Risk management, Credit risk.

Published in: Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 28, No. 11, (November 2004), pp. 2603-2639.

Previously titled: Measurement and Estimation of Credit Migration Matrices

Books Referenced in this paper:  (what is this?)

Download paper (441K PDF) 37 pages