DefaultRisk.com the web's biggest credit risk modeling resource.

Home Store Glossary Links Site Guide Search
pp_score_31

Up

Submit Your Paper

Fitch Ratings Jobs

[ Worldwide]

Post Your Résumé
For Recruiters

Featured Book
Paris-Princeton Lectures on Mathematical Finance 2004
Paris-Princeton Lectures on Mathematical Finance 2004 Finance 2004

by Rene A. Carmona, Ivar Ekeland, Arturo Kohatsu-Higa, Jean-Michel Lasry, Pierre-Louis Lions, Huyen Pham, Erik Taflin, Springer, (
October 1, 2007), Paperback, 248 pages

Fitch Quantitative Financial Research (QFR)
Training Discounted for DefaultRisk.com visitors only:

The Mathematics of Credit Derivatives: The Essential Credit Modelling and Pricing Companion
by Philipp J. Schönbucher,
WBS Training, August 2003, DVD / Interactive CD-ROM
Sponsor:
Shop at Amazon.com and support DefaultRisk.com

In Rememberance: World Trade Center (WTC)

Estimation of the Default Risk of Publicly Traded Canadian Companies

by Georges Dionne of HEC Montréal,
Sadok Laajimi of HEC Montréal,
Sofiane Mejri of HEC Montréal, and
Madalina Petrescu of HEC Montréal

August 2006

Abstract: Two models of default risk are prominent in the financial literature: Merton's structural model and Altman's non-structural model. Merton's structural model has the benefit of being responsive, since the probabilities of default can continually be updated with the evolution of firms' asset values. Its main flaw lies in the fact that it may over- or underestimate the probabilities of default, since asset values are unobservable and must be extrapolated from the share prices. Altman's nonstructural model, on the other hand, is more precise, since it uses firms' accounting data—but it is less flexible. In this paper, the authors investigate the hybrid contingent claims approach with publicly traded Canadian companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The authors' goal is to assess how their ability to predict companies' probability of default is improved by combining the companies' continuous market valuation (structural model) with the value given in their financial statements (non-structural model). The authors' results indicate that the predicted structural probabilities of default (PDs from the structural model) contribute significantly to explaining default probabilities when PDs are included alongside the retained accounting variables in the hybrid model. The authors also show that quarterly updates to the PDs add a large amount of dynamic information to explain the probabilities of default over the course of a year. This flexibility would not be possible with a non-structural model. The authors conduct a preliminary analysis of correlations between structural probabilities of default for the firms in their database. Their results indicate that there are substantial correlations in the studied data.

JEL Classification: G21, G24, G28, G33.

Keywords: Default risk, public firm, structural model, reduced form model, hybrid model, probit model, Toronto Stock Exchange, correlations between default probabilities.

Books Referenced in this Paper:  (what is this?)

Download paper (605K PDF) 63 pages

Credit Scoring books at amazon.com

[Home] [Credit Scoring Papers]

Support DefaultRisk.com by shopping at Amazon.com

 

 

Home ] Up ]

Please contact me with problems or suggestions.
Copyright © 2000-2008 DefaultRisk.com
Last modified: May 15, 2008