DefaultRisk.com the web's biggest credit risk modeling resource.

Credit Jobs

Home Glossary Links FAQ / About Site Guide Search
pp_price_29

Up

Submit Your Paper

In Rememberance: World Trade Center (WTC)

Export citation to:
- HTML
- Text (plain)
- BibTeX
- RIS
- ReDIF

Structural Models of Corporate Bond Pricing: An empirical analysis

by Young Ho Eom of Yonsei University,
Jean Helwege of Ohio State University, and
Jing-zhi Huang of Pennsylvania State University

Summer 2004

Abstract. This paper empirically tests five structural models of corporate bond pricing: those of Merton (1974), Geske (1977), Leland and Toft (1996), Longstaff and Schwartz (1995), and Collin-Dufresne and Goldstein (2001). We implement the models using a sample of 182 bond prices from firms with simple capital structures during the period 1986-1997. The conventional wisdom is that structural models do not generate spreads as high as those seen in the bond market, and true to expectations we find that the predicted spreads in our implementation of the Merton model are too low. However, most of the other structural models predict spreads that are too high on average. Nevertheless, accuracy is a problem, as the newer models tend to severely overstate the credit risk of firms with high leverage or volatility and yet suffer from a spread underprediction problem with safer bonds. The Leland and Toft model is an exception in that it overpredicts spreads on most bonds, particularly those with high coupons. More accurate structural models must avoid features that increase the credit risk on the riskier bonds while scarcely affecting the spreads of the safest bonds.

Published in: Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, (Summer 2004), pp. 499-544.

Download paper (319K PDF) 46 pages