Avoiding the Rating Bounce: Why rating agencies are slow to react to new information

DefaultRisk.com the web's biggest credit risk modeling resource.

Submit Your Paper

Fitch Ratings Jobs

[ Worldwide]

Post Your Résumé
For Recruiters

5^th Most Cited

An Introduction to Copulas -- 2nd Edition

An Introduction to Copulas - 2nd Ed.
by Roger B. Nelsen, Springer, January 13, 2006, Hardcover, 270 pages

Training Discounted for DefaultRisk.com visitors only:

The Mathematics of Credit Derivatives: The Essential Credit Modelling and Pricing Companion
by Philipp J. Schönbucher,
WBS Training, August 2003, DVD / Interactive CD-ROM

Sponsor:
Shop at Amazon.com and support DefaultRisk.com

Avoiding the Rating Bounce: Why rating agencies are slow to react to new information

by Gunter Löffler of the University of Ulm

May 2004

Abstract: Rating agencies state that they take a rating action only when it is unlikely to be reversed shortly afterwards. Using a formal representation of the rating process, I show that such a policy provides a good explanation for the empirical evidence: rating changes relatively seldom occur, they exhibit serial dependence, and they lag changes in the issuers' default risk. In terms of informational losses, avoiding rating reversals can be more harmful than monitoring credit quality only twice per year.

JEL Classification: G2, G21.

Keywords: credit rating, rating agencies, conservatism, rating migration.

Published in: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 56, No. 3, (March 2005), pp. 365-381.

Books Referenced in this Paper: (what is this?)